June 26, 2011 journal, a prime example of country totalitarian federal state justice system. Southwest Airlines pilot broadcast his cursing rant against gays and drinking pilots. A public speaker in Germany arrested for making anti-Semitic remarks. In Russia when the K-Jews took over in 1917 the Bossick revolution with killer Lenin, it was a capital crime. The big troop withdrawal on TV is a joke, it would take a hundred years to get them out at this speed. The president is smelling more like George W. Bush everyday and Cheney. America is under the hostile rulership of the Zionist imposters lock stock and barrel with the banks totally which is the foreign Rothschild Red Shield Federal Reserve which is the stock market and the Red Star of David masquerading as the favorite people God but their God is the Devil, Satan himself. There is no salvation in the phony House of Israel. We will only be delivered when Christ the Messiah returns to cleanse the earth of its sin. If you touch their sacred pagan money you may pay a heavy price so live without it I say. Although money is the color green, it is red with the blood of vast invisible innocent life. German Karl Marx invented communism and it was first installed in Russia by Khazar cryptos converts to Babylonian talmudic Judaism in 1917, then Hitler in the 30's, then in China in the '50s. We are more than just dominated by the same Russian Communists. This same race of people dominate all information Americans are allowed to hear today. You may say communism fell in Russia and it did play out but the Zionists had a much bigger fish on the hook to catch and control. The Khazar J-e-ws were driven out Russia as they were expelled from Spain in 1492 and almost every European nation in last 500 years but the American Protestant Church has fallen hook line & sinker for their big lie of being God's favorite people but they are actually the Antichrist believing in no God at all. The Talmud "Bible" call us "gentiles" goyim (cattle), they treat us like non human people. The legal system in this country is what ever they want to make it, they control evidence. They manufacture wrongful evidence and they interpret evidence to suit their agenda. "United States v. David R. Hinkson-Case History and General Overview 1. David R. Hinkson, a man who was never charged criminally with even a parking ticket, has been made the subject of two recent Federal criminal indictments in the State of Idaho. He has been detained by the United States Government in the Ada County Jail in Boise Idaho, for the last eighteen months without a bond hearing. 2. Hinkson, a 48 year old white male, is an outspoken inventor/scientist who owns a sole proprietorship business known as WaterOz which produces dietary supplements, primarily in the form of ionized mineral waters . His business has been relatively successful and has an international network marketing distribution network. Gross yearly income of the company has reached as much as $3 million in 2002 and is just over $1 million currently. 3. Hinkson has a history of philanthropy connected with his business and has given his products to those in need such as veterans and the elderly who are unable to afford same, has worked in children's tuberculosis clinics and has provided free product to the BOTHA Aids Clinics in South Africa. At the time he was initially arrested on November 21, 2002, fifteen doctors specializing in treatment of infectious diseases were awaiting his arrival in the Ukraine and his lectures concerning the use of WaterOz products in the treatment of tuberculosis and other diseases. 4. At the same time he was developing his ionized mineral process, Hinkson was active in the 'Truth in Taxation' movement through appearances on his own talk radio show and others in the mid and late 1990s. 5. Since the late 1990s, Hinkson has strongly advocated his own position with the IRS that he was not a 'person required to file' individual income tax returns nor was he responsible for withholding employment taxes from his WaterOz employees and repeatedly requested a hearing on his position. Immediately after he requested a Seventh Amendment Common Law civil trial concerning his position in March, 2000 criminal proceedings were brought against him. Grand Jury Hearings 2001 2002 6. Former Idaho Department of Labor Case Supervisor Shawn McDonald testified under oath that IRS Agents Morgan and Hines had vowed to "raid" Hinkson's factory and have him thrown in jail as early as February 2000. These agents (Steve Hines and Gerald Morgan (alias Vernon) also reached out to the FDA and commenced a long term investigation, attempting to identify any wrongdoing on Hinkson's part that would justify a raid, arrest and his pretrial incarceration. 7. Hinkson, who is known to be a non violent individual, was falsely accused of being the head of two militias, a machine gun dealer and as having 'followers who could do violent acts' all such false accusations were designed to make it appear Hinkson was a terrorist type located in the hills of North Central Idaho. 8. By early 2000 Agent Morgan indicated that he was pursuing Hinkson's case civilly as it pertained to unfiled tax returns. However, after Hinkson gave notice that he was demanding a Seventh Amendment civil trial on the tax filing issue, Morgan referred Hinkson's case for criminal proceedings. 9. From approximately January 2000 until June 2002 the Government used administrative summonses to obtain Hinkson's banking and credit records, and in the summer of 2001 began presenting information from the IRS and FDA investigation to a Grand Jury in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. The Grand Jury did not issue a True Bill; so the information was submitted to a second Grand Jury in Boise, Idaho, in 2002. Likewise, no True Bill was issued against Hinkson by the time the second Grand Jury was excused in early April 2002. July 17, 2002: First Indictment 10. An old friend whom Hinkson had hired at the WaterOz factory, and supported in other ways, turned him in to the IRS in 1998 for a reward when Hinkson refused to sign over part of his business to the friend and his wife. Hinkson had caught the man stealing from WaterOz and had fired him and his wife. Hinkson's first indictment by the Untied States Government on July 17, 2002, concerned itself with Hinkson's failure to file income tax returns, structuring (in the form of withdrawing cash from his own bank account to pay payroll) and FDA product labeling charges (all herein referred to as the "Tax Case"). November 21, 2002: Illegal Raid 11. The Government conducted an illegal raid on Hinkson's home and business on November 21, 2002, using battering rams and armed with machine guns. He was immediately released on his own recognizance when no evidence of weapons or violence was was found or could be proven. Company records, computers and other property were seized. 12. The indictment in the Tax Case that was served on Hinkson November 21, 2002, had four components: 1. Income Tax [misdemeanor]; 2. Employment Tax [felony]; 3. Structuring under Money Laundering [felony with Forfeiture]; and 4. FDA product labeling charges which were the pretext for the November 21, 2002 raid and no knock search by the FDA, FBI and IRS [misdemeanors]. 13. After the second grand jury was excused in early April, 2002, Hinkson filed a lawsuit against Assistant United States Attorney Nancy Cook and IRS Special Agent Steve Hines for harassment and improper conduct. At that point, Cook reconvened the Grand Jury and in one day, July 17, 2002, allegedly obtained a True Bill. This retaliatory move by Cook canceled Hinkson's civil law suit. 14. Cook then moved to have the indictment sealed under the secrecy rules. For four months Hinkson did not know he had been indicted, but his competitor, ENIVA, had been told this crucial bit of information and used the same in it 's attempt to gain an unfair competitive advantage. February, 2003 to March 27, 2003: Undercover Agents Attempt to Entrap Hinkson 15. After almost two months of contact, Government informant J.C. Harding attempted to entrap Hinkson with a body wire on March 27, 2003. Harding and Hinkson had a rambling conversation that touched on the exploits of both, but never dealt with the purported murder for hire allegations until, at the end of the session Harding repeatedly stated that he could 'get the job done' (i.e., arrange for the three assassinations) if Hinkson would 'just get serious' and tell Harding, in fact, what it was that Hinkson wanted him to do. 16. On the tape, Hinkson continually maintained that he was 'just suing these Feds' and that he didn't want to harm them. In fact, Hinkson made the point that he was using the law of their own 'Babylonian' system against them and denied wanting to cause physical harm to anyone. 17. While the tape is completely exculpatory, the Government has treated it as if it were inculpatory, deliberately misconstruing words used by Hinkson in order to perpetuate a fraud that Hinkson was acting in league with Harding to solicit murder. It was actually Harding that was vehemently soliciting Hinkson. 18. There is no evidence that Hinkson threatened anyone. Even though Harding (the undercover agent) repeatedly raised the issue of "murder for hire" of federal officials during the taped conversation, Hinkson never agreed with, confirmed or admitted he had such intentions. Hinkson, however, was incarcerated without bond or bail and was never given an evidentiary hearing as required. April 4, 2003: Arrest 19. Based on what he DIDN'T say on the above tape recording, but what the Government imputed, i.e., that Hinkson had 'followers' who could take him up on his 'offer' to murder someone, Hinkson was falsely arrested on April 4, 2003, on the pretext that he had violated the conditions of his pretrial release from the July 17, 2002, indictment in the Tax Case by soliciting the murder for hire of three federal officials. 20. At the time of Hinkson's arrest on April 4, 2003, by FBI Agent Long, Hinkson asked for attorney. There was a recording by Hinkson of the initial phase of the arrest, (by his personal tape recorder which was in his pocket.) When Hinkson 's tape recorder was discovered at the time of the arrest Long ordered it to be turned off. 21. Agent Long lied under oath at the April 9, 2003, hearing, stating that Hinkson had not demanded an attorney. When Hinkson's own recording was discovered in his personal belongings and transcribed by a court reporter, it was proven that Long had perjured himself regarding this matter. 302 Report: Denial of Existence and Subsequent Production of Same by Government 22. When a 302 Report of the alleged confession was requested during preparation for trial in the Tax Case, Wendy Olson, Assistant United States Attorney vehemently denied its existence. Such a 302 appeared at the time of the second indictment (discussed subsequently.) April 9, 2003: Detention Hearing 23. Hinkson was subsequently FURTHER detained after a detention hearing on April 9, 2003, the outcome of which was based on unreliable three and four party hearsay allegations that he 'solicited' someone for the murder of three federal officers (a federal judge, prosecutor and IRS agent). 24. Detention was ordered after this 'Kangaroo Court' style hearing wherein Magistrate Judge Williams (who, according to observers, slept through most of the hearing) read from a prepared text finding Hinkson was a ' danger to the community' and a 'flight risk' (18 USC 3142, et seq.). 25. The FBI agent was permitted to proffer mere hearsay statements of three alleged 'witnesses,' and an alleged confession by Hinkson into the record. 26. FBI Agent Long perjured himself as he lied under oath on four occasions during the hearing (about such things as whether Hinkson had demand counsel at the time of his arrest). All four lies were deemed by the Court to be inconsequential (i.e., the Court was complicit with the US Attorney in putting on a show but denying substantive justice.) 27. Hinkson was denied a de novo evidentiary hearing by the District Court Judge who later recused himself, denied review by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and denied certiorari at the United States Supreme Court. April 26, 2004 May 5, 2004 : Eight day Jury Trial on Failing to File and Structuring 28. An eight day jury trial was had April 26, 2004, on failure to file income tax, failure to withhold and structuring. Hinkson previously pled guilty to two FDA misdemeanor counts based on his vicarious liability for strict liability offenses by an owner of a business (and not any actual knowledge by Hinkson as to such product defects) so the conviction was strictly related to Hinkson' s supervisory role as a control person. (See United States Supreme Court Dauerwigt and Park decision.) 29. Even though Hinkson was vigorously defended on the failure to file tax returns based on the Cheeck case with the appearance of numerous witnesses who substantiated his long standing and strongly held good faith belief that he was not a person required to file and vigorously defended on the structuring charges as having used cash withdrawn from his own bank account to pay his business payroll for a number of years, while his small town credit union was unaware that it should have granted Hinkson a payroll exemption to the structuring law, he was found guilty on 29 counts. 30. Even though the structuring charges came about because Hinkson's business manager withdrew two sums of money on each Thursday and Friday to meet payroll and it was clearly proven that there was no criminal conduct, Hinkson has paid $135,500.00 to the United States Government to settle the question of Forfeiture. An appeal is pending the sentencing in the "Tax Case" and will be affected by the recent Blakely decision. 31. Sentencing was set for July 31, 2004, but was postponed until after the trial in the second indictment. June 23, 2004: Second Indictment 32. Hinkson has been incarcerated since April 4, 2003, on the theory that he was a danger to the community and a flight risk. His only crime in jail has been possession of a yellow highlighter pen which was previously permitted until the rules were changed to ensnare Hinkson. He has been starved and psychologically mistreated upon the orders of the Untied States Marshal's office. 33. The alleged 'threats', or what was used as pretrial release violations now form the basis of a federal indictment from a March, 2004, Grand Jury in the form of an undated True Bill which was served on Hinkson June 23, 2004, and which concerned itself with alleged treats to hire an assassin to kill federal officials (the "Threats Case"). 34. This case would seem to be a singular travesty of justice, except that the US Attorneys around the country are using the 'murder for hire of a federal judge' scenario as a regular means to detain certain high profile persons who have attacked the tax system. Tactical advantages of this allegation for the Government include: 1. The elimination of good 'citizen oriented' judges (such as Judge Lodge here) who might otherwise be predisposed to give the defendant a fair trial; 2. The ability to instantly incarcerate the defendant and keep him in jail; 3. The elimination of most of the eligible bar as defense counsel, in that criminal defense attorneys who practice in federal court generally refuse to take a case involving threats on the life of a federal judge in order to protect their own reputations; 4. Because of a loophole in the law created by Congress, the government is not required to prove the allegation of hearsay threats against federal officials by sworn testimony. All that is needed is a cooperating witness and the Assistant United States attorney can proffer enough unreliable hearsay evidence into the record to imprison an unsuspecting individual for years without bond or bail." "Help Americans Release Political Prisoners-The Purpose Of HARPP-HARPP was started 3 years ago by David Hinkson in order to lend legal assistance for those having been unjustly incarcerated by an out of control Judicial System. This sewer system has become nothing more then a human collection apparatus for the worlds largest privately operated prison network, or forced labor camp, that depends on our Justice System for an unending supply of bodies to fill product orders for global markets. It is unfortunate that Dave Hinskon became one of the very people he set out to help, but such are the times we live in when utter societal decay and ignorance take hold of the masses and opposites become the norm. If so inclined and want to know the basis for our current system of Gulags, then you must read This Is Why Many Go To Jail, by Lynn Schmaltz, in order to properly appreciate just how completely despicable the whole thing has become. This site will be adding content on an ongoing basis, along with news briefs concerning David Hinkson, so come back soon and often." Hinkson's trial was a mockery of Justice and is a typical case of America's political prisoners in a Zionist unconstitutional environment. http://rolandhinksonfiles.com/library/hoyt-series/ai1k1.html "In 2005, David Hinkson, the owner of WaterOz, an Idaho County business, became the poster child of government corruption when he was indicted and convicted of crimes which he did not commit and, in fact, which never happened. It was a perfect storm involving a corrupt judge, miscreant prosecutors who suborned perjury and a clever witness, who was facile at fabricating stories touting non-existent military valor, stolen from other service men and women of America. Hinkson was handed a life sentence in 2005 because the trial judge would not allow him to present hard evidence of his innocence, such as his passport showing he was not in Idaho when the crimes supposedly were committed. Now the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the Hinkson conviction in May 2008, has overturned that decision in a complicated and convoluted opinion by Judge Carlos Bea on November 5, 2009. The Bea decision affirms Hinkson conviction by creating new law that prohibits review of bad lower court rulings which interfere with a defendants right to a fair trial by excluding evidence of innocence. Basically, under this new law, a trial judge's errors virtually never get reviewed. Is this the doctrine of the "infallibility of judges" in a new socialist state that is being created by government officials? Everyone agrees that the government's sole witness to the charges on which Hinkson was convicted, Joe Swisher of Cottonwood, ID, committed the crime of perjury while on the witness stand. By falsely claiming to be a decorated Korean Era combat veteran who was wounded on the battlefield (as a credibility booster), Swisher offered a highly dramatic presentation that he had been approached by Hinkson to kill government officials. In his flawed-fiction about Hinkson, Swisher selected as the times he was solicited by the WaterOz owner, periods when Hinkson was out of the State of Idaho. In a similar blunder, Swisher, selected for his resume of military awards, commendations which were created after he claimed to have received them. Swisher even had the nerve, with the prosecutor's consent, to present in the Hinkson trial a forged government document (Form DD-214 or Defense Department discharge form) which showed numerous military commendations had been awarded to him. He even went so far as to say that his decorated war hero status was the reason that Hinkson supposedly wanted to hire Swisher as a hitman. That statement was the link which tied the Swisher lies about his military service to the lies about the supposed Hinkson solicitation. The recent Ninth Circuit decision agreed with Judge Tallman, a Ninth Circuit Court judge, that proof of Swisher's lies about his war hero status was irrelevant to Hinkson's conviction and affirmed Judge Tallman's exclusion of Swisher's military record from the jury's consideration. As it turns out, Swisher, never saw combat, although he claimed he was wounded in the Korean War. Someone did the math and discovered he was age 13 when the conflict started and 16 when the Armistice was signed, so Ooops, that was the tip off that Swisher was lying! A few stutter-steps later, with a new fabricated story, Swisher made a quick change and claimed his injuries came in the post-Korean War period while he was on a classified mission to free POWs from supposedly secret N. Korean prison camps. Again this story was proven false because the Marines conducted no such missions and Swisher did not have the training to participate in any such activity as he was a Pfc. Swisher's own military file was used to convict him of forging military documents (a DD-214), perjury before the VA and theft of government property, not to mention the crime of wearing military medals of honor never awarded to him. To say that Swisher was untrustworthy as a witness in the Hinkson case is to put it mildly, but the problem was how to communicate that information to the Hinkson jury. Most experts would agree that the military record itself was the best evidence of the falsity of Swisher's statements. With Swisher's record in the courtroom during the Hinkson trial, Judge Tallman simply found that there were "other documents" which supported Swisher's story of secret missions in Korea. If so, those "other documents" would have been introduced to prevent Swisher's 2008 conviction. But, because those "other documents" were a figment of Judge Tallman's imagination Hinkson was denied the opportunity to prove his innocence. Judge Tallman actually ruled Swisher's military record would confuse the jury. What he meant was, the military record would distract the jury from focusing on the government's theory of the case and that it would be confusing to learn that Hinkson might be innocent. In legal circles, the decision of Judge Bea affirming the 2005 Hinkson conviction is being seen as a vindication of Judge Tallman because he also sits on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In order to white wash Judge Tallman's bias for the prosecution, a totally new standard for reviewing trial court decisions has been created that should pretty much eliminate future appeals. Here is the problem, Richard Tallman, a Ninth Circuit judge, sat by designation as the Hinkson trial judge. He is the one who consistently denied Hinkson the opportunity to prove his innocence. Key to Hinkson's defense was showing the jury a copy of Swisher's military record, which was devoid of any evidence that would have indicated Swisher was in combat, wounded in action, served in Korea, or decorated with medals. Swisher's 2008 conviction for these crimes now absolutely and unequivocally proves that Swisher lied in the Hinkson trial. Unfortunately, at the time of the Hinkson trial, Swisher had not been convicted and that was at the height of his spreading lies about being a decorated war hero. In fact, what the record showed was that Swisher was court marshaled and busted from a Corporal to Pfc., rather than being an award winning GI. But, starting in 2002 in order to claim VA benefits, Swisher felt he had to pretend to be a war hero; Swisher wanted both the psychological and the monetary benefits of being accorded this special status. He paraded around Idaho County wearing a fishing vest festooned with some of the highest honors a soldier can receive, which were pinned to his chest like Christmas ornaments. This was a slap in the face to US Veterans everywhere, because Swisher, a phony hero, sucker punched his fellow servicemen, including Hinkson who was honorably discharged from the Navy after the Viet Nam War. As a decorated war hero Swisher was allowed to go to the front of the line, ahead of real heroes, especially at VA medical facilities. Also, he was given $3,000 per month as a disability benefit and he received hundreds of thousands of dollars of free medical care at the VA Hospital for a 2002 heart attack, when neither that condition, nor any of his alleged wounds were service connected. All of these benefits were based on his forged DD-214. Do you think a jury would have believed one word Swisher uttered about Hinkson soliciting him to be a hitman if the jury had been informed that Swisher was lying about being a decorated combat hero? If Swisher could tell a whopper like that with a straight face, why not make up a story about Hinkson? Especially, if the jury had learned that Hinkson was not in Idaho and Swisher was in a wheelchair with a catheter from a massive heart attack when the solicitation supposedly happened. You see with Swisher it was sour grapes. Swisher lost his civil lawsuit attempt to steal Hinkson's WaterOz business in '03. So it was payback time for Swisher. and he promised he would go to Boise to testify in a way that would put Hinkson in jail for life. With the help of a dishonest judge, corrupt prosecutors and some power crazed federal officials who wanted Hinkson behind bars, Swisher was able to get the job done simply by spinning a yarn. In order to protect Judge Tallman from the embarrassment of a reversal, seven members of the Ninth Circuit panel said that his rulings should not be subject to review. Why was it that these judges were afraid to criticize one of their own colleagues? Maybe, J. Tallman never should have been designated to as the trial judge, when it would be his colleagues who had to review his decision. How unjust can that be? If the judge you face in the trial court slides behind the curtain and then reviews his own decisions, there is no independent, objective or neutral review. Isn't it the same when the colleagues of a trial judge make up the reviewing panel? In such cases, even the appearance of propriety is lost. One famous evaluator of Ninth Circuit decisions calls the Bea opinion "disappointing." Another author mentioned that Judge Tallman was faced with conflicting evidence in Swisher's military file. However, that was the big lie that Judge Tallman told in order to keep Swisher's military record from the jury. He did not want the jury to find out for themselves who Swisher really was, so he invented facts that did not exist by saying that there were "other documents" which supported the Swisher story of secret missions in N. Korea, then excluded the evidence which would have proven otherwise. So Judge Tallman, what were those "other documents," where are they, how did you get them, why didn't anyone else (like Hinkson) have them and why weren't they a part of the record on review? When Judge Tallman's misconduct came to the surface, it was covered up by his brethren on the Ninth Circuit. Clearly, Judge Bea's opinion was a whitewash of Judge Tallman's erroneous rulings, and it was not about the Hinkson case any more; rather it was a referendum on Tallman himself. Clearly, such raw politics do not belong in the court system. Every Veteran in the USA should be offended because the court system has tarnished their service by allowing Swisher, the imposter, to hide the truth about his stolen valor from a jury in order to obtain the conviction of an innocent man. The question is, will the veterans of America demand the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals throw out this decision that degrades the honors bestowed upon real heroes by upholding the likes of a Joe Swisher who claim those honors by fraud? By the way, Judge William Fletcher and 3 other judges of the Ninth Circuit did not bow to the political pressure from the Tallman supporters. They carefully analyzed the case and, in a dissenting opinion, pointed out why Swisher's deceit about his military service and prohibiting the jury from seeing the military record deprived Hinkson of a fair trial, but they were in a 7 to 4 minority. What has been lost for Americans by this decision is the assurance of a court system filled with stable individuals of high integrity. This case, along with a string of other evidence, shows that we are being goaded by self seeking government officials who are using our freedoms as their spring board to power in these perilous times". Respond for any reason at the following email: www.rolandhinkson@q.com Phone (970) 325-4522 The real heroes of truth are listed below not necessarily in the order of their bravery. Most voices of truth stop just before crossing the line into enemy territory of Zionists Federal Reserve Wall Street bankster terrorists the all powerful and lethal Antichrist. Ted Gunderson former CIA agent reported on Child kidnapping for Jewish sacrifices. David Hinkson founder of WaterOz healthy minerals in Idaho public speaker and more. Larkin Rose of Philadelphia author who proved there is no income tax law, one year in federal prison, is a lucky man to get by with just one year for bucking the beast at all. Tupper Sassy recently deceased author of Rulers of Evil book and a number of books. Texe Marrs, Power of Prophecy Austin Texas, he tells the truth on the power structure. List of dangerous preachers on the airways, Benny Binn, John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Jack Van Impe, the late Jerry Falwell, and more.